Home » Evaluation Rubric

Evaluation Rubric

The judges will use this rubric to evaluate your project.

 

Exceeds Expectations (3 pts)

Meets Expectations (2 pts)

Falls Below Expectations (1 pt)

Educational (30%)

 - Exceptional effectiveness and clarity of definition of cancer- Exceptional communication of how cancer relates to topic (tobacco or UV rays)- Exceptional communication of cancer prevention methods

- Includes effective use of supporting data

 

 - Uses multimedia experience- Defines cancer- Communicates the connection between topic (tobacco or UV rays) and cancer

- Communicates prevention methods

- Includes supporting statistics or data

 - Project would not be considered a multimedia experience- Cancer definition is incomplete or inaccurate- Unclear how cancer and topic (tobacco or UV rays) are related

- Design does not address prevention or is inaccurate

- Does not include supporting data

Audience (10%)

 - Exceptional use of design elements which target 5-11 year old children or grades K-5 (or international equivalent)- Clearly used additional research to design for optimal usability by this age group and target demographic- Skill level required to use project is at child’s level

- All content is appropriate for children and written on a child’s reading/developmental level

 - Fundamental design elements are targeted to 5-11 year old children or grades K-5 (or international equivalent)- Skill level required to interact or use project is appropriate for children- All content is appropriate for children and written on a child’s reading/developmental level - Design is not targeted to children or skill level is too advanced for ages 5 to 11 or grades K-5 (or international equivalent)- Content is inappropriate for children

Fun/Engaging (20%)

 -Would reasonably capture and hold the attention of children ages 5-11- Consistent positive emotional response for user; highly enjoyable- Reward or gain in addition to knowledge and achievement  of learning goals

- Challenging, must use thinking and reasoning skills

 - Would reasonably capture the attention of children ages 5-11- Achieves learning goals but with average gain or enjoyable experience- Somewhat challenging -Would not reasonably capture the attention of children ages 5-11- No reward or gain for user- Limited or minimal emotional experience

- Minimal enjoyment or suspense, lack of challenge or utilization of thinking or reasoning skills

Creative/Innovative (20%)

 - Exceptionally artistic, imaginative- Utilizes a wide variety of resources or techniques to create project- Inspirational

- Project is very unique and different

 - Artistic, colorful, utilizes various resources or techniques- Presents information in a new and interesting way - Minimal or no artistic or inspirational qualities- Uses basic techniques to deliver experience

Quality of Presentation (10%)

 - Polished, organized delivery of submission- Exceptionally concise, accurate, and clear in all documentation and entry requirements- Exceptional descriptions in questions and answers in application

- Free of grammar and/or spelling errors

- No bugs or programming errors

 - Project is polished visually and technically- Project text has minimal or no grammatical and/or spelling errors- Minimal or no bugs

-Participant completes questions in project submission form with sufficient information to understand project

 

 - Project is not polished with visual and/or technical deficits- Excessive grammatical and/or spelling errors- Numerous technical bugs.

-Participant completes some questions in project submission form but provides insufficient information to fully understand project

 

Accuracy (10%)

 - Claims and statistics are based on reliable, current scientific evidence- It is clear that student put much effort into finding the most useful and relevant statistics for the project topic and audience- References are presented in organized or professional fashion - Claims and statistics are based on reliable, current scientific evidence- References are provided - Some data inaccurate or from questionable or out of date sources- Some claims or statistics not sourced

Comments are closed.